Personal Overview: being a bit of a history
buff I knew the Pocahontas legend, both the one portrayed in this film and the belief
that a lot of it was an invention by John Smith.
As a kid I actually used to get Pocahontas
and Minnehaha confused. I have no idea why.
Disney took a real risk by portraying a
real historical person involved in an event that is well known by many
Americans as part of their history.
Despite it’s genuine origins and the
dubiousness many feel about the truth of how John Smith represented events
Disney chose to present it as a clash of cultures, love story. It’s almost
Romeo and Juliet in the way it works.
They certainly attempted to garner a big
audience by casting Mel Gibson as Smith. I’m not sure when he voiced this, but
due to the release dates of the two films Gibson’s performance as Scottish
patriot William Wallace in Braveheart would have been fresh in many moviegoers
minds when Pocahontas hit the screens. Gibson was also reunited with old co
star Linda Hunt from The Year of Living Dangerously as she voiced the speaking
willow tree Grandmother Willow.
I went to see it with a friend, we enjoyed
it as far as it went and as long as we didn’t think too hard about it. I found
it difficult to ignore the historical inaccuracies and what I knew about what
happened after. It’s unusual for a ‘Princess’ movie for a number of reasons,
and one of those is that Pocahontas doesn’t actually get the guy. I had
been a little concerned that they may revise history to give themselves the
happy ever after ending.
Pocahontas would go on to become one of the
official Disney Princesses.
Hero/es: you’re always playing with fire
when you try to portray a real event. Pocahontas comes out of this pretty well,
playing to script by saving John Smith from her father’s war club. Smith
himself is very much a Disney male hero and stands up to the greedy social
climber Ratcliffe (voiced with relish by David Ogden Stiers) and a pre Batman
Christian Bale does a good job with Thomas, playing him as a kind of secondary
hero to Smith.
Villain/s: they kind of wrong footed me
here. I knew Ratcliffe was the bad guy in this from the moment he first
appears. The clothes, the hair, that look like something bad smelling is under
his nose the whole time, it just screams villain. He didn’t twirl his thin
little moustaches, but he came close. Where they wrong footed me was with his
pampered pug Percy. I thought Percy may have been a bit of a rat (pugs do like
rather ratlike), but after a rocky beginning he turned out okay and actually
made friends with Pocahontas’ raccoon friend Meeko.
Cuteness Factor: being at one with nature
Pocahontas has two near constant friends. One of them is a hummingbird called
Flit and the other is Meeko; the raccoon. The interaction between the two
provides a lot of humour as well, like when Meeko causes Flit to get his pointy
little beak jammed in the side of the canoe. Meeko’s constant search for food
is also often amusing and from what I’ve heard about raccoons, pretty right on
for behaviour, for all that Meeko is diurnal and real raccoons are nocturnal.
Animation: they tried hard, but I felt they
only really got it right with the animals. The people appeared a bit flat. It
may have been that they didn’t have the variety of coloured and elaborate
costumes that they usually had to work with.
Final Words: it did quite well at the box
office, although that they may have been flow on from the stunning success of
The Lion King, the fact that Gibson was huge at the time and curiousity about
how Disney would handle a genuine historical person and events. They managed to
get a big of magic in there which I felt was odd, I’m not sure exactly what
good it does, but Pocahontas seems to be able to harness some sort of natural
power, mostly leaves fly about behind her in a trail when she’s running about
the forest singing. It got enough criticism about historical inaccuracies that
the company’s probably been scared off from covering real people and events for
some time to come.
No comments:
Post a Comment