C, yes we're at C already, where does the time go? I did the B's last week, so the C's follow them, because that's kind of how I roll and it makes everything much neater.
He wrote a number of short works and poetry (it is in fact poetry that was first published under his now famous pen name) before Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, published in 1865, although he had been writing it for a number of years in various forms. The book started as stories that he used to tell the youngest daughter of a family friend; Alice Pleasance Liddell, and she is in fact the Alice at the heart of it (although Dodgson always denied that she was the only model for Alice). In 1871 he published a sequel Through The Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There, it was somewhat darker, which reflected Carroll's view of life at the time, his father died in 1868, which plunged him into a depression that plagued him for years. In 1876 he published an epic nonsense poem called The Hunting of the Snark. He didn't publish for years after, but did attempt a comeback of sorts in 1895 with the two volume Sylvie and Bruno, the story of fairy siblings. It remained in print for many years, but is considered a lesser work.
Further and related reading: if you read
Alice's Adventures in Wonderland than you must also read
Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There, if for no other reason than it contains the poems
Jabberwocky and
The Walrus and the Carpenter. There is of course also
The Hunting of the Snark and
Sylvie and Bruno. If you do intend to read the
Alice stories then you absolutely have to get ones that are illustrated by
John Tenniel, other illustrators have done it, but no one else quite captures the spirit of the stories and the characters in the way
Tenniel did. It's been filmed on a number of occasions, the
Disney animated version is best known, and while the artwork is quite stunning and a feast for the eyes, and they knew better than to mess around with the dialog it's really a bit of a mish mash of the two
Alice books and doesn't make a lot of sense as one narrative. A lot of people did like
Tim Burton's 2010 live action film version starring
Johnny Depp as the
Mad Hatter, I wasn't one of them. The less said about it, the better.
Wonderland seems to be public domain, and any number of authors and advertisers have appropriated the idea and the characters. Alice and her many
Wonderlandian friends can be found wandering about the various
Disney theme parks on any given day. There's a chain of pancake restaurants here in Australia called
The Pancake Parlour that use
Alice and Wonderland to advertise. Some of the
Wonderlandians, or rather their offspring, have found their way into the
Mattel doll line of
Ever After High, and novelist
Shannon Hale made liberal use of the setting for her final book in the
Ever After High trilogy (
Wonderlandiful World). The real life model for Alice, was a key character in
Philip Jose Farmer's Riverworld series, and
Melanie Benjamin's fictional biography of the real
Alice Pleasance Liddell,
Alice, I Have Been. There's a never written 3rd
Alice adventure featured on a bookshelf in one of the background scenes of
Neil Gaiman's Sandman graphic novel, that may have been the artist's inspiration, but it is a very
Gaiman type of thing to do.
Tad Williams also had a
Wonderland reality in his
Otherland series. American writer and film producer
Frank Beddor wrote a series called
The Looking Glass Wars which is clearly inspired by
Lewis Carroll's Alice books, even lifting it's title from the second of them. I could go on listing books and authors that have been influenced by it all day, that's how important and influential a work it is.
Angela Carter - 7 May 1940 - 16 February 1992.
Carter is best recognised as a magical realist. She was ranked 10th in
The Times 2008 list of 50 greatest British writers since 1945. Her first novel,
Shadow Dance came out in 1966. I know her for a collection of reworked fairy tales,
The Bloody Chamber, which appeared in 1979. Two of her fictional works were adapted for the screen,
The Company of Wolves (1984) by
Neil Jordan, which was based on two of the reworked stories in
The Bloody Chamber and
The Magic Toyshop (1987) based on her novel of the same name. The author was extensively involved in the film making process in both cases.
Angela Carter died in 1992 at the age of 51 after developing lung cancer. At the time of her death she was working on a sequel to
Jane Eyre by
Charlotte Bronte.
The Bloody Chamber is a collection of short fiction. All the stories in it are reworkings of well known fairy tales. If anyone ever thought that fairy tales were only for children
The Bloody Chamber should dispel that illusion. In most cases the clue to what story she's doing is in the title or clearly evident by the contents, but not all, as she quite often adds elements that many readers are unaware is even contained in the original story. For the record the stories are:
The Bloody Chamber (
Bluebeard),
The Courtship of Mr Lyon (
Beauty and the Beast) the clue to that one is in the title. The idea of the Beast being rather leonine is far from new or unique, even
Disney's version looked like a lion,
The Tiger's Bride (another look at
Beauty and the Beast),
Puss-in-Boots (
Puss in Boots),
Carter's intention here was to just have fun and write a genuinely comedic story, it's rather needed as the rest of the collection is rather bleak without a lot of what you could term happily ever after endings,
The Erl King (the
Erl King legends), the Erl King is a rather demonic sort of elf, he's not heard about much these days, but I was aware of him from a poem my mother knew, he was also in an episode of
Buffy the Vampire Slayer,
The Snow Child (there were a few influences, but it's most likely a rather obscure variant on the
Snow White legend), nothing like
Disney at all here, and you definitely don't want to tell this one to children,
The Lady of the House of Love (I'd never actually heard of this, but it was apparently based on a radio play that
Carter herself wrote called
Vampirella), given it's origins it is unsurprisingly a vampire story,
The Werewolf (
Little Red Riding Hood), a different look at the legend, which casts Little Red Riding Hood as the villain,
The Company of Wolves (
Little Red Riding Hood)
Carter clearly had her favourites and Little Red Riding Hood is one of them, this is a closer adaptation of the original and it was later made as the film of the same name, the final story was
Wolf-Alice (another variation of
Little Red Riding Hood with references to
Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There), it looks at a view of the world through the eyes of a feral child.
It's not easy reading for the most part, but it is well worth doing and it helps one to remember that most fairy tales have far deeper meaning and were not really intended as bedtime stories for children. In some ways
The Bloody Chamber kick started the current fascination with variants on fairytales and is responsible for an ever growing sub genre.
Further and related reading: most of
Carter's fiction (10 novels, 6 collections of short fiction of which
The Bloody Chamber is one, and 5 children's books as well as screen plays, dramatic work and radio plays,
Vampirella was one of those, as well as the articles she wrote in her capacity as a journalist) tends to concern itself with her feminist views and continually challenge the reader to see beneath the surface of the words on the page.
Angela Carter isn't responsible for fairy tale retellings, but she did give it a healthy kick along. It's a virtual sub genre of it's own these days. Urban fantasy author
Seanan McGuire had a good look at it in
Indexing.
Jim Hines gave the old fairy tales a new fun spin with his comedy series featuring 3 butt kicking fairytale princesses in his
Princess quartet. The prolific
Mercedes Lackey dabbles in it with her
Elemental Masters and
Fairy Tale series. The idea behind the graphic novel
Fables by
Bill Willingham is that fairy tales live among us, the TV shows
Once Upon a Time, and
Grimm to a lesser extent, work off the same basic premise. The
Ever After High books based on the line of dolls concern themselves with the offspring of various fairytale characters. One of the most
Carterish entries is
Sarah Pinborough's Fairy Tale series comprising
Poison (
Snow White)
Charm (
Cinderella) and
Beauty (
Sleeping Beauty), and all that really only scratches the surface on a sub genre that seems to continually growing. Of course you could also track down and read a collection of
Grimm's and
Perrault's originals.
Susanna Clarke was an overnight sensation that took about 10 years to happen. She first started work on
Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell in 1993, but it was not published until 2004. The book became a huge sensation. It crossed boundaries and it seemed everyone bought it. It really kicked off when
Clarke's now husband, but then writing teacher,
Colin Greenland sent one of her short stories called
The Ladies of Grace Adieu to his friend
Neil Gaiman.
Gaiman loved it and from there it found it's way to editor
Patrick Nielsen Hayden.
Clarke herself was unaware of this until
Hayden called her and offered to publish the story in his anthology
Starlight 1. The anthology won the
World Fantasy Award for best anthology in 1997.
Clarke continued to publish short fiction in various anthologies (
Starlight 2 and
3) over the next few years and one of them
Mr Simonelli, or the Fairy Widower was shortlisted for a
World Fantasy Award in 2001. The massive
Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell came out in 2004 and was an almost instant bestseller. In 2006
Clarke published a collection of stories set in a similar alternate world as her huge hit, called
The Ladies of Grace Adieu and Other Stories. It was well received overall, but people did want something more substantial like
Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell. That was the last novel length work from
Clarke. She says that she is working on a sort of sequel to
Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell, but with 9 years since
The Ladies of Grace Adieu and Other Stories, and over 10 since
Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell I wouldn't hold my breath.
Given that
Susanna Clarke has only published two books and one of them was a collection of short stories I didn't really have a lot to choose from.
Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell absolutely took the fantasy world by storm when it was published in 2004. It scooped the pool of fantasy awards in 2005 and it even won
The Times Best Novel of the Year award. What made all this more stunning was that it was a debut. This wasn't really repeated until last year when
Anne Leckie's gender bending science fiction novel
Ancillary Justice did much the same thing when it came to the genre awards.
I didn't really like
Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell when I first read it and couldn't see what the fuss was all about. It took a second read for me to appreciate exactly what
Susanna Clarke had done. The book still polarises readers between those who love it and those who simply don't get it.
It isn't that easy a book to love really. Mr Norrell is extremely unsympathetic as a central character and I didn't much like Jonathan Strange either to be totally honest, although he's easier to like than Norrell. What I loved about the book was this separate story that she had going on in the footnotes.
Terry Pratchett is known and loved for his footnotes, but his are amusing little asides,
Susanna Clarke's set out a history that never existed. The world that Strange and Norrell inhabit isn't just a Georgian England in which magic works, it actually makes sense that it does and there's an entire history which explains how it works and why it works and that it's history is very different from the one that we know and learn about. That's the real achievement of the book for me. It was something quite extraordinary that
Susanna Clarke did there.
Further and related reading: it may be possible to find copies of the anthologies that
Susanna Clarke contributed to when she was working on
Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell, but I don't think it would be easy. If you liked the debut then
The Ladies of Grace Adieu and Other Stories may be up your alley. Alternate histories are a sub genre of their own, but there aren't many like
Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell. I can think of a couple of examples though.
Naomi Novik's Temeraire series is close. It has way more action than
Susanna Clarke's alternate history about magic, although it does share an era.
Novik's twist on it is that dragons exist and they were instrumental in helping the British defeat Napoleon. It's been described as
Patrick O'Brian with dragons. The characters do act and speak using the same faux Georgian that
Clarke's characters do, so it's a bit Regency romance with dragons, too.
Caroline Stevermer and
Patricia C. Wrede wrote a trilogy called
Cecelia and Kate, which is about two cousins who navigate their way through a British regency era where magic exists and they know all about it. The first of the books (
Sorcery and Cecelia or The Enchanted Chocolate Pot) was originally written in 1988 and republished in 2003, when it was followed by
The Grand Tour or The Purloined Coronation Regalia in 2004 and
The Mislaid Magician or Ten Years After in 2006. They took it a step further than
Susanna Clarke and wrote the first book in an epistolary style. Where I found
Susanna Clarke's faux
Austenish style complete with misspellings a rather irritating gimmick, it seemed totally natural in the
Stevermer Wrede collaboration. There's also
Mary Robinette Kowal's Glamour series which is set in a Regency where magic works, they tend to be more a Regency romance in style than
Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell.
Carlo Collodi - November 24, 1826 - October 26, 1890.
Collodi's name isn't instantly recognisable, but his best known creation, a wooden puppet called
Pinocchio is. Before turning his talents to children's literature,
Carlo Collodi (his actual name was
Carlo Lorenzini) had already gained some notoriety in Italy as one of the founders of the satirical newspaper
Il Lampione. He published a number of books and sketches which were satirical and political in content, before his first children's work which was a translation of
Perrault's French fairytales. The work that gave him enduring fame originally appeared as a serialisation in an Italian magazine for children and the author died in 1890 unaware of the fame that awaited his creation.
Pinocchio is the only one of
Collodi's works that has any enduring fame. It's worth noting that the original book is very different to what a lot of people think of when the name is mentioned and that tends to be
Walt Disney's 1940 animated version. The Pinocchio in the book is less likeable than
Disney's version. The author was a Florentine and even now in Florence they're very proud of the long nosed marionette and various representations of him appear everywhere. Despite the differences from the
Disney film I prefer the original. It has a magic and an edge that the cartoon simply didn't. There are no cute cats or goldfish and Jiminy isn't actually named, he's an actual cricket who can talk, but Pinocchio kills him fairly early on and his warnings about disobedience and hedonism help the wooden boy develop a conscience. The idea that there are unscrupulous characters like the Fox and the Cat lurking around every street corner to lead young boys astray is actually rather scary really. In
Collodi's original Pinocchio was hanged at the end of the 15th chapter, but his publishers managed to convince him to introduce the blue or turquoise haired fairy to help him out. It's a reminder that even in the 19th century with all that had gone before people could still add to the pantheon of fairy tales.
Further and related reading:
Pinocchio is a modern fairytale along with things like
The Wonderful Wizard of Oz,
Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and
The Wind in the Willows and deserves to be mentioned in the same breath as those classics. Nothing much else of
Collodi's has survived, and it was very different in tone to this fairytale. The character has been used in all sorts of film and other media adaptations from
Disney's 1940 film to the rather obnoxious versions in
Shrek and
Bill Willingham's Fables. I can't readily find anything else that is quite like
Pinocchio, but in some ways it does share something with
Mary Shelley's science fiction classic
Frankenstein in that it's about something inanimate that is given life.
Seanan McGuire explores the concept to a certain extent in her
Velveteen books in which the titular character is a super hero whose power is animating toys like teddy bears, but they don't have free will in the way that Pinocchio did. The concept also appears in
Pixar's Toy Story films as well as a great many stories by children's writers like
Enid Blyton where the toys have a life of their own once the owners are asleep or out of the house.
So that's the C's. Next week we explore the D authors.