Personal Overview: how Disney never made
Rapunzel into a film before 2010 I will never know. The story of the girl with the
incredibly long hair was very well known and just begged to be given the Disney
treatment.
There was apparently a great hoohah about
altering the name of the film from its original title. It was initially known
as Rapunzel, but changed to alter appeal. Personally I don’t think calling it
Rapunzel would have stopped boys from seeing it, and I don’t think the name
Tangled drew any more through the turnstiles, but nor did it turn any away.
It’s a very hip treatment of the Brothers
Grimm story and Rapunzel’s hair and name aside it really isn’t recognizable as
the original.
The desire to show this as a new version
for the 21st century was reflected in the casting. Former pop
princess Mandy Moore voiced Rapunzel and also sang her songs, Zachary Levi
(formerly the lead in comedy action TV show Chuck) was cast as the roguish thief Flynn
Rider. To give the film some musical credit Broadway star Donna Murphy was cast
as Mother Gothel. Broadway just radiates from her even when she’s just talking
and not singing.
It’s a fast paced story and has a heap of
action. The dialog sparkles and it’s well characterized. The Princesses began
to get a bit more agency with The Princess and the Frog and that continues in
Tangled. I actually feel that Rapunzel may be the most fully developed as far
as character goes for any of the ‘Princess films’. She also has something else
that none of the others seemed to possess and that’s a super power. That hair
is definitely a super power. I found the whole healing tears thing a bit of a
weakness in the story. It’s a factor of the original story, but we never knew
that this version had that until her hair was cut off and there was no other way
to heal Flynn and get a happy ending. It was a bit deus ex machina for me.
Hero/es: just like in The Princess and the
Frog there are three. Rapunzel with her super powered hair and her frying pan, she does the wide eyed innocent thing so well, and being raised in a tower and
never seeing anyone else other than Mother Gothel that makes sense, and they
didn’t over or underplay that. Flynn is the roguish hero and again he doesn’t
start off as totally good or totally bad, his partners in crime are another story,
like many good heroes he is preferred to sacrifice himself for Rapunzel. The
third is the horse Maximus, more about him in Cuteness Factor.
Villain/s: Mother Gothel. It’s established
even before Rapunzel is born that she’s bad. She hides the magical flower from
everyone else, despite it’s properties and the good it can do, just so she can
use it to retain her youth. She then steals a child, locks said child away and
uses her magical gifts on herself, and regularly belittles the girl in order to make her
afraid to go out. Evil woman. Beautifully played and with relish by Donna
Murphy.
Cuteness Factor: everything about this
movie is cute, but the standouts for me are Rapunzel’s constant companion
Pascal the chameleon, often disparagingly referred to as a frog by Flynn.
Pascal never says a word (he’s not a talking animal. In fact there are none
of those in Tangled), but conveys everything by expression, action and changing
colour to match his moods. Maximus. Having seen Sleeping Beauty not that long
ago and then seeing this I am convinced that Prince Philip’s unnamed horse is
related to Maximus, must be a grandfather or something, the resemblance is too
close to be coincidental, and not all Disney horses look the same. Maximus was
originally intended to be a dog, which is why he acts like one most of the
time. He’s a 'doghorse'. His search for Flynn and then the animosity between the
two makes for plenty of laughs and it’s very cute to see the way Rapunzel tames
and then treats him like a dog to get him to cooperate with Flynn.
Animation: there were advances made in
animation between The Princess and the Frog and Tangled. They combined CGI with
traditional hand drawn animation and this is why I’m glad they waited until
they did to make the film. One of the problems with old style animation is that it
never really got hair quite right, and as hair is a major part of Tangled it
had to be spot on, and it is. It looks real. As does the water in the dam burst
scene, which gives that some extra tension. This happens mostly with Rapunzel,
but at times her face does look a little plastic and doll like rather than
human, which does tend to be a drawback of CGI when doing people. Other than
that it is a feast for the eyes.
Final Words: I’ve seen Tangled a bunch of
times since it first premiered at the cinema and it never fails to delight. I
always find something new in it. It doesn’t quite top Aladdin, but it comes
close. If I was ever asked to name my favourite Princess, I’d say Rapunzel,
there’s just something about this portrayal of her that I really love.
No comments:
Post a Comment