Showing posts with label films. Show all posts
Showing posts with label films. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 27, 2016
The Pixar Film Project
Over the last few years during the Christmas/New Year/Summer period I and my wife have done a watch on a theme and I've blogged it. We kind of failed last year during the attempt to watch the TV series Robin of Sherwood, but this year we're going to try the Pixar films.
There is a little explanation required here of how this will work. A few years ago we did Disney films, and we did Brave (which is a Pixar film, but comes across like a Disney one, Merida was even made a Disney Princess) and also Wreck-It Ralph (a Disney film that people think is a Pixar one), so neither of those will appear. We're watching in release order so that means that the 3 franchises (Toy Story, Monsters and Cars) will be broken up by other films in between their various instalments.
When I did Disney I kind of broke the posts into sections, because while they are enjoyable Disney films do tend to run to a formula.
I'll try and do that a little with the Pixar ones and look at the film and how I react to it and cover the cast in a separate bit.
So now that's all done, scroll down and find the first film.
Monday, April 6, 2015
Hugo nominations 2015
Now before everyone runs screaming from the screen, thinking that this is just another rant on the storm of controversy that the announcements have created, it's not. I am aware of all that, and it concerns me, but I don't dwell on it. I only look at 3 categories, because to be totally honest they're the only 3 I think I can speak with anything approaching authority on. Those 3 categories are:
Best Novel.
Best Dramatic Presentation Long Form (usually a feature film)
Best Dramatic Presentation Short Form (generally an episode of a TV show, but things like songs and even the over the top acceptance of a previous award winner have made the shortlist in the past).
Best Novel: yes that is last year's winner. As I don't have a crystal ball I thought the best way to illustrate these was to use last year's winner.
This is in no particular order.
Ancillary Sword by Ann Leckie - the sequel to Ancillary Justice. I haven't read it (I've only read one of the nominated works. None of my nominations got up). I wasn't as taken by Ancillary Justice as everyone else seemed to be. Maybe it's because of my uneasy relationship with science fiction, and that's what Ancillary Justice is. I also didn't see replacing the he personal pronoun with she for everyone, regardless of gender, as ground breaking as many others did. I've heard good reports of Ancillary Sword, and Hugo voters do seem to like sequels, so this one could very well earn Ann Leckie her second rocket ship in a row.
The Dark Between the Stars by Kevin J. Anderson - another science fiction entry. It's the first book in Anderson's Saga of the Shadows series, and it follows his Saga of the Seven Suns series. I haven't read anything by Anderson, but I know people who have, and he doesn't get many positive reviews. He may have improved, I'm not sure. I suspect the nomination is a nod to recent efforts to get popular best selling work on the ballot in favour of work that does well critically, but doesn't reach as wide an audience.
The Goblin Emperor by Katherine Addison - I actually do want to read this, but try finding a copy of it down here. The item of hens teeth immediately springs to mind. I do however have a copy on order and I'm rather excited to see what the fuss is about. From what I know about it, it attempts to do something different with the genre and it's one of only 2 fantasies on the ballot (the Hugo began it's life as a purely science fiction award, and while fantasy has made raids on it in recent times, many do still consider it an award for works of science fiction, not fantasy). Plenty think it's a debut, it's actually not. Katherine Addison is a pseudonym for Sarah Monette, who also wrote Melusine. I don't think it will win, but I am pleased it was nominated.
Lines of Departure by Marko Kloos - I have to admit when I saw this on there, my first thought was who? It's the second book of the Frontlines series, which is military SF in the vein of John Scalzi's Old Man's War. Interestingly it was originally an ebook only, via Amazon.com, and it was given a print release by Amazon's imprint 47North. I think this is a bit of a victory for epublishing and something that will become more prevalent in the future. Again, I don't think the entry will excite enough voters to get it the award, though.
Skin Game by Jim Butcher - now this one I have read. I'm quite a fan of Harry Dresden, and have read all of the books, even the short story collection of Side Jobs. I was surprised to see it on the list. For one it's urban fantasy, and that's a subgenre Hugo voters tend to shy away from. The closest any urban fantasy author has ever come to winning a Hugo was Seanan McGuire's Campbell win in 2010. I doubt it will garner many votes, despite it's best seller status. The Dresdens are a bit like the literary equivalent of fast food. Nice for an occasional guilty treat, but it's nutritional value is questionable, and you wouldn't want a solid diet of it. There's been a bit of talk about the best selling entries and how they got onto the short list, but I think they earned their nominations, and it may also have the effect of getting people who wouldn't ordinarily know about the Hugo, to take an interest and vote. Inclusion is what the genre and the award should be all about, and getting something like an entry of the Dresden Files onto the ballot may help with that.
Best Dramatic Presentation Long Form: now I personally don't really agree that either this award or the Short Form one should be part of the Hugos. They're generally films or TV shows, and these both have plenty of their own awards. It's rare that anyone connected with the film even shows up to collect the award, which shows how much meaning they attach to it. However I have seen a few of the nominated works and I feel strongly enough about it to say a few words.
Captain America: The Winter Soldier - I enjoy all the Marvel films, and outside of The Avengers, I think the two Captain America films have been the strongest entries in that particular series. I did like Iron Man (the first one), but the 2nd and 3rd didn't live up to the first one, and The Winter Soldier more than held it's own with its predecessor, and also The Avengers, which it was intimately connected to. This was like a Daniel Craig Bond movie with super powers. Scarlett Johansson's Black Widow absolutely stole the show, and it could have really been titled Captain America & Black Widow: The Winter Soldier. There was a nice connection to the first film, and the reverberations from this film were felt throughout the Marvel cinematic universe, bleeding into Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D and will also be in evidence in the upcoming Avengers 2: Age of Ultron. The winner for mine, but probably won't get the votes.
Edge of Tomorrow - I really hope this doesn't win, and not because I don't like Tom Cruise, I do, but this looked to me like a version of Replay, but with a military SF edge. Urk. How it made the ballot, I do not know.
Guardians of the Galaxy - and Marvel and Disney continue to take over the cinematic world. You couldn't not like this film. Fun and action from start to finish. A genetically engineered raccoon as a hero, who knew? The ending scene with the baby Groot dancing gets it a nomination alone.
Interstellar - this one will probably win. I haven't seen it yet, so I can't say too much, but what I have seen and heard about it didn't excite me greatly. It is however the sort of thing that gets votes at the Hugos.
The Lego Movie - this was also a huge amount of fun. Batman's voice, all the in jokes and takes from other films and games. Something that shouldn't have worked, but did. It's a shame there's no Best Song at the Hugo's because I would have nominated Everything is AWESOME. That song ear wormed me for days afterwards.
Still from last year's winning entry. Game of Thrones: 'Rains of Castamere'.
Best Dramatic Presentation Short Form: I have similar feelings on this one to the Long Form award, but a lot of those were driven by the fact that there seemed to be an unwritten rule that only Doctor Who was allowed to win it. Despite the actual quality of the seasons episodes, it seemed to get at least 3 nominations every year. Then a few years ago it became the Doctor Who V Game of Thrones award. Game of Thrones won it last year, and the producers David Benioff and Dan Weiss were on hand to accept it, which was a nice touch. I'm not going to discuss the individual episodes that were nominated, but the shows themselves. It's really pleasing to me to see 5 TV shows nominated this year and very different shows at that. The genre actually has diversity and voters have finally realised that. It's a long way from nominating things like Fuck Me, Ray Bradbury by Rebecca Bloom and Chris Garcia's acceptance 'speech' when his The Drink Tank fanzine won the Hugo in 2011, made the shortlist for this award.
Doctor Who: 'Listen' - not only did the show only get one nomination, it was actually the standout episode of the season that got nominated. Aside from brief interruptions by Game of Thrones, the evergreen British SF show has owned the award in recent times, and while it's now got more competition I still think it will be hard to beat for the award.
The Flash: 'Pilot' - I really like The Flash. I'm old enough to remember the previous attempt in the '90's to make this into a show (the on screen father of the current Flash actually played The Flash in that show, nice little nod there). Compared to it's stablemate Arrow, I find The Flash a little lightweight, and think Arrow is the better show, although I'm sure some of that is driven by the fact that the wonderful Emily Betts Rickard is in Arrow and totally makes the show as Felicity Smoak. I think the show's lightness may count against it. The Hugos are serious business, don't you know?
Game of Thrones: 'The Mountain and the Viper' - if anything is going to topple Doctor Who, it's Game of Thrones. It could very well repeat 2014's win for 'Rains of Castamere', here. I couldn't vote for it, though, not on that particular episode, actually not for the season overall, either. I do enjoy the show, but it's never improved on Season 1, which for me is still the best season of it. People and voters do like it, though, plus the show's creator George R.R Martin will definitely be present.
Grimm: 'Once Were Gods' - if I hadn't been sitting down when I read the nominations I think I would have fallen over when I saw this one. I really like Grimm, although I'd like it even better if it were the Monroe and Rosalee show. It's one of a whole bunch of eligible shows and even though it has no chance it's nice to see it there, and realise that people have woken up to the fact that genre TV does not start and end with Doctor Who and Game of Thrones.
Orphan Black: 'By Means Which Have Never Yet Been Tried' - this actually got a nomination last year, and it was well deserved. I hope it wins, I know The Flash and Grimm have no chance, but Orphan Black could. It deserves recognition purely and simply for the stunning performances by Tatiana Maslany.
So that's my take on the Hugo nominations. I'll be back in a few months to discuss the winners, hopefully Noah Ward won't make their presence too well felt in these 3 categories.
Wednesday, October 1, 2014
Modesty Blaise probably not coming to a screen near you
Occasionally I encounter a concept which to me simply screams out to be made into a blockbuster movie. Two of the concepts that have stayed with me the longest are George MacDonald Fraser's Flashman books (one of them was actually made into a film, although it wasn't that well received. I may do more on that in another post one day) and the other is Peter O'Donnell's former criminal mastermind, turned part time spy; Modesty Blaise.
For those that aren't aware or have never heard of Modesty she began in this way.
****
Peter O'Donnell was a successful writer of comic strips for daily newspapers. He'd written an adaptation of the James Bond adventure Dr No (this was the Ian Fleming novel, not the movie version that opened the long running franchise. I believe the Dr No of the title was the villain's pet monkey in the book, not the villain himself), written long running adventure serials Garth and Romeo Brown (the latter began O'Donnell's association with artist Jim Holdaway, who also drew Modesty Blaise until his death in 1970). In 1963 he was asked to come up with something new and that something new was Modesty Blaise. By this stage Peter O'Donnell had a good 7 or so years of solid work behind him.
The writer actually drew on personal experience to create Modesty. He remembered an encounter that his army unit had experienced with a half wild child when they were stationed in the Middle East in 1943/44. That brief encounter was what gave him the idea for Modesty Blaise and became part of her origin really.
****
Modesty Blaise used to appear in a daily newspaper here; The Sun (it's the Herald Sun these days), but I never really read it. I wasn't a big fan of what I referred to as the 'talkie strips'. I preferred the funny ones like Hagar the Horrible or Snake Tales. Part of the problem for me with strips like Modesty Blaise was that they were a continuing story and told in little bite sized pieces, so if you missed a few or even one you then missed part of the story and could get hopelessly confused. We never had the paper delivered, so I had to rely on Dad remembering to bring it home from work.
My first proper exposure to Modesty Blaise came when I was about 13, and I picked up a cheap paperback collection with two complete adventures in it. As a bonus it contained her origin story and I think that was what hooked me.
****
Modesty's story begins in the latter stages of WW II, somewhere on the border between Greece and Turkey. She's estimated to be anywhere from 4 - 6 years old. The hand that she's clung to for a lifetime of horror and fear goes cold and she's left on her own in the world. It was never explained or revealed exactly who that hand belonged to. It may have been a female relative (mother, aunt, sister, cousin), a friend or neighbour, possibly even a kindly stranger who took care of the orphaned war child.
Modesty survives for the next 7 - 9 years by doing what she can to get by. She roams all over Turkey, the Middle East and North Africa. She forages for food, begs, picks up menial labour (herding goats or sheep), steals if she has to and wanders from refugee camp to refugee camp.
One day when she's 13 and in a camp in Persia (modern day Iran) she sees a gang of kids about her age rob an old man of his food ration. Without even knowing why she's doing it, Modesty fights the kids and retrieves the ration which she gives back to the old man.
The two of them form a friendship. The old man's name is Lob and before the war he was a professor in Hungary (I don't know if it was ever revealed what subject he taught, but I have a feeling it was philosophy). Modesty and Lob leave the camp together.
That first night on the road as they prepare for sleep and Modesty calmly and unselfconsciously disrobes in front of him he christens her Modesty and chuckles as he does so. Prior to that the war child did not have a name.
Lob teaches his young protege how to read and write, she takes her surname of Blaise from one of the stories Lob teaches her. Blaise was the name of Merlin's tutor. He also gives her a personal philosophy. As Modesty grows and matures Lob realises that she can't just keep wandering around with him, she has to make a life for herself somewhere, so they decide to head for Tangier. Unfortunately Lob doesn't make it. He dies on the way. Modesty buries him and grieves briefly then goes to Tangier on her own.
In Tangier Modesty became a cigarette girl in a casino owned by a local mob boss. In short order the ambitious girl moved up the ranks becoming a croupier and the girlfriend of the boss. With Modesty by his side he increased his own smallish holdings and when he was killed by rivals, Modesty stepped in to take the reins.
At the tender age of 21 Modesty was running a global crime organisation known as The Network. On a trip to Thailand to inspect her organisations holdings there she spotted a British mercenary by the name of Willie Garvin in a Muay Thai boxing match. She thought he would make useful muscle. He was cooling his heels in a Thai jail when Modesty came looking for him and to the dazed and confused young Englishman she was a saviour and from that day on he called her Princess and woe betide anyone who didn't show her the correct respect.
Willie proved to be more than just muscle, he was despite the rough exterior, intelligent, resourceful and charming. Before long he was Modesty's right hand man and The Network's 2IC. It should be noted here that Modesty and Willie's relationship is strictly platonic and should never be interpreted as anything else. If anything they're more brother and sister than girlfriend and boyfriend.
Once the two have made enough they quit their life of crime and retire to England at relatively young ages (I don't know that their ages are ever stated, but I always see Modesty as in her late 20's and Willie in his mid to late 30's) to enjoy the fruits of their labour.
Modesty had gained British citizenship some years earlier by marrying and divorcing an Englishman in Beirut. She gets herself a penthouse and enjoys her passions of gemstone collecting and philanthropy. Willie achieves his lifelong dream of owning and running a pub in the Midlands.
It's too good to last. Before long they're bored by lives that aren't filled with adventure and danger, so when British Secret Service official Sir Gerald Tarrant asks for some off the book assistance the duo are ripe for the picking. Tarrant didn't really want Willie, but as Modesty explains early on, they're a package deal. You don't get one without the other.
That's where the stories really start.
****
The cinematic potential was realised as early as the mid 60's. British Lion Films announced that they had a film written, however it was never made.
A film called Modesty Blaise was released in 1966. The rights were acquired by Mim Scala and the idea was to cast Barbara Steele as Modesty (I haven't ever seen Steele act, but she did have the right look) and Michael Caine as Willie (oh why didn't this happen?). However Scala sold the rights to Joseph Losey and that's where things went wrong.
Initially Losey made the right moves, he hired O'Donnell to write the screenplay and cast Terrence Stamp as Willie. Stamp, while he had dark hair, had the presence and rough edges needed for the street smart Willie Garvin, for some reason they made him wear this horrible blonde wig in the film. Couldn't they have just dyed his hair? O'Donnell's screen play was extensively rewritten, to the extent that O'Donnell later remarked that only one of his original lines survived (he later adapted it into a novel and continued to write Modesty Blaise novels that performed well critically and commercially for some years after). Then they cast Monica Vitti.
This isn't a slur on the actress, but she simply wasn't right for Modesty. Modesty Blaise is a slender, dark haired woman with Mediterranean (Greek) features and colouring. Monica Vitti was a curvy, blonde, fair skinned Italian.
The film itself was very campy, and is regarded as a camp classic these days. It even included a musical number and a lot of it was played for laughs.
The cardinal sin among many fans was having Modesty and Willie's relationship turned into a romantic one. They actually kissed. This is so against canon that fans couldn't accept it. It was moderately successful, but not what anyone had hoped for and it looked like the end for Modesty as far as films or even small screen was concerned.
****
In 1982 American TV network ABC made a one-hour pilot for a planned series called Modesty Blaise.
Although both characters had O'Donnell's back stories they had American accents and operated out of Los Angeles. They were more like PI's, than spies. The plot sounded like the plots of plenty of American 80's, 90's and even 00's and beyond hero for hire shows (The A-Team, MacGyver, Burn Notice, etc...).
Despite relatively decent reviews and doing well enough with test audiences the pilot wasn't picked up and the series never eventuated.
****
That may have been it, but for a scene in the Quentin Tarantino 1994 classic Pulp Fiction. When John Travolta's unflappable, heroin addicted hit man Vinnie Vega is surprised in the bathroom by on the run boxer Butch Coolidge (Bruce Willis) and shot to death he was reading a Modesty Blaise comic collection at the time. People picked up on that and it turned out that the book was actually Tarantino's and he was a fan.
In an effort to keep him happy and on the off chance that he may actually want to make a Modesty Blaise film at some point, Miramax bought the rights.
Their option was running out by the early 2000's, so they hired Tarantino devotee Scott Spiegel to direct a direct to video production called My Name is Modesty.
****
My Name is Modesty came out in 2003 and while it's lack of production values are clearly on display I think it gets a bad rap.
It's a prequel. It's largely Modesty's origin, and it was designed as background for Tarantino to come in and make the real film, the big budget, blockbuster. By the time something happened with the property Tarantino was busy working on Kill Bill and then Inglourious Bastards.
The start of it was an updated version of what Peter O'Donnell experienced in the Middle East during WW II with the feral girl. This time it was a group of British soldiers in the Balkans who encountered the half wild child.
The story is set during Modesty's time in Tangier, running her boyfriend's casino. The casino is overrun by a gang of criminals and Modesty plays their leader (Nikolaj Coster-Waldau, now known for his work as Jaime Lannister in HBO's Game of Thrones. Interestingly enough he'd make quite a good Willie Garvin, although at 44 he's getting a bit old) for the right to let some of her people go. If he wins she gives him some of her story and if she wins he lets a hostage go.
So this way viewers see Modesty's story, which does largely follow O'Donnell's idea. She meets Lob in a refugee camp in Iran. He's a professor of philosophy I think, but he's not as old as he was in the strip. In addition to reading, writing and philosophy he also teaches Modesty how to fight, which was not something the original Lob could ever have done, nor did he need to. Modesty could fight for herself thank you very much! He became collateral damage in a terrorist attack in Algiers and then Modesty made it to Tangier and the casino and wound up where she was in the film.
Fans didn't really like it. Plenty jumped on Alexandra Staden as Modesty, saying she didn't look right, but I thought she did a good job, especially when you consider that in the film she's possibly in her late teens, so would look and act younger than the Modesty in her 20's does in the strip and the books. The real problem for most of them seemed to be that this was a prequel so therefore no Willie. Willie has a huge fan base out there, he's possibly more popular than Modesty herself.
After this third attempt Peter O'Donnell had become completely disillusioned with the film and TV industry's attempts to turn his creation into one of theirs and he requested that no further attempts be made to film Modesty Blaise.
****
Peter O'Donnell died in 2010, and I assume his literary estate passed to his family and it remains to be seen whether or not they'll honour his wishes in regards to filming. I still think if done right it would make a cracking film.
I first thought about it's cinematic potential in the late 80's. I was watching a Bond film and I started to wonder if there was a female equivalent who could be successful with film audiences and then I remembered Modesty Blaise.
I followed possible cinematic developments with interest and it may have been why I wasn't that down on My Name is Modesty, of course it did also tell the story that originally interested me in the character.
I have to admit that I suck at fantasy casting, although I did get the role of Galen right in The Hunger Games when I fantasised about it being filmed after reading the 3rd book and reviewing it as if it were a new film release.
For years I had issues with Willie. I just couldn't find a blonde British actor of the right age who worked for me. Now it's Modesty. Over the years I've thought of people like Angelina Jolie and Eliza Dushku, even Morena Baccarin. Now I come up blank, although despite it being rather obvious, and her not being quite right physically I think Scarlett Johansson could have a pretty good run at it after her turn as The Black Widow. If Marvel/Disney won't give her a film of her own, maybe whoever makes Modesty Blaise would.
Willie Garvin in recent times seems to be coming out of the woodwork. At one time I thought Daniel Craig, but he's far too identified with Bond now. There's Nikolaj Coster-Waldau, who I mentioned earlier and the other two standouts for me are: Phillip Winchester (he plays Michael Stonebridge in the TV show Strike Back, mind you if and when Daniel Craig chucks it in I think he'd make a great Bond) and Charlie Hunnam. Both Winchester and Hunnam are in their early 30's (Winchester is 33 and Hunnam 34).
I'm pretty sure eyebrows rose at the the naming of Charlie Hunnam. Despite being best known for playing the American bikie club leader Jax Teller on AMC's Sons of Anarchy, Hunnam is actually British. If you cut the hair and shave off the facial hair he would make a good Willie. Better than Winchester, who due to his height tends to stand out and he's a little clean cut, British public school boy to successfully sell Willie.
I don't know a lot about directing, but I can see three possibilities there. Quentin Tarantino, as he was the reason fuss started again in the 90's, plus he knows and is familiar with the material. I also think he has the right touch for it. He's probably cooled on it since he was originally attached to the concept, and that sort of thing may leave a bit of a bad taste in his mouth after his hissy fit about the Bond reboot Casino Royale, which he claimed was his idea.
Speaking of Casino Royale, I have to name Martin Campbell. If we can forget about Green Lantern, the Kiwi director has a very good action pedigree, having also directed Goldeneye and the two Antonio Banderas/Catherine Zeta Jones (another possibility for Modesty in days gone by) Zorro films.
My third choice would be Joss Whedon. Joss likes to work with strong female characters and while he's never said it, I think he'd be a Modesty Blaise fan. However he likes to have a lot of creative control and may not want to work to canon. He has however worked with 3 of my picks (Morena Baccarin at 35 a little older than I'd like, Eliza Dushku, also outside my ideal age range now and Scarlett Johansson) in the past successfully. He may be too busy with the ever expanding Avengers franchise, though.
****
Now if someone would just listen to me and make this happen. I think we could have the next long running, big action franchise on our hands.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014
The Disney Film Project
I’ve long wanted to watch all of Disney’s
animated features, but never really been able to do it. I have seen quite a few
of them, but there are some significant gaps in my watching. As it is, although
I’m watching all of them, there are some exceptions. One is Snow White and the
Seven Dwarfs, not because I don’t like the film, but more because I never
picked up any of the previous DVD releases and it hasn’t yet been rereleased,
but when it is I will look at it and assess it here.
Fantasia is another exception. It’s one
I’ve never really taken to. I can see the artistic merit and the idea of
marrying pieces of classical music to the animation, but it doesn’t have a real
story and is more a series of pieces related by concept rather than what we
think of as a traditional film.
There’s probably some other gaps for
similar reasons as that and later on when Disney began their seeming intention
to take over the entire cinematic world it becomes difficult to distinguish
between what is and what isn’t a Disney film.
We started with Pinocchio.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)